The Organic Food Diet
Organic food is food produced according to organic standards, which means crops grown without the use of conventional pesticides, as well as artificial fertilizers or sewage sludge, animals reared without the routine use of antibiotics and without the use of growth hormones and food processed without ionizing radiation and without the use of a wide range of food additives. It is produced on all levels without the use of genetically modified organisms. Historically, these farms have been small family-run farms.
Once only available in small stores or farmers' markets, organic foods are becoming much more widely available. Organic food sales within the US have enjoyed 17 to 20 percent growth for the past few years while sales of conventional food - while still larger in size - have grown at only about 2 to 3 percent a year. This large growth is predicted to continue, and many companies are jumping into the market.
There is evidence that organic farms are more sustainable and environmentally sound, among other benefits (see benefits). These claims, however, are subject to dispute and are not settled among scientists. One vocal critic in particular, Anthony Trewavas, has written detailed critiques of organic agriculture.
Organic Foods
Fresh food
Fresh food is seasonal and perishable. Vegetables and fruits are the most
available type of organic, fresh food, and are closely associated with
organic farming. They are often purchased directly from growers, at farmers'
markets, from on-farm stands, supermarkets, through speciality food stores,
and through community-supported agriculture (CSA) projects. Unprocessed
animal products like organic meat, eggs, dairy, are less commonly available
in their purely "fresh" form.
Processed food
Processed food accounts for most of the items in a supermarket. Often,
within the same store, both organic and conventional versions of products
are available, and the price of the organic version is usually higher (see
modern developments). Most processed organic food comes from large food
conglomerates producing and marketing products like canned goods, frozen
vegetables, prepared dishes and other convenience foods.
Processed organic food usually contains only (or at least a specified
percentage of) organic ingredients and no artificial food additives, and is
often processed with fewer artificial methods, materials and conditions (eg:
no chemical ripening, no food irradiation).
Identifying organic food
At first, organic food comprised mainly fresh vegetables. Early consumers
interested in organic food would look for chemical-free, fresh or minimally
processed food. They mostly had to buy directly from growers: "Know your
farmer, know your food" was the motto. Personal definitions of what
constituted "organic" were developed through firsthand experience: by
talking to farmers, seeing farm conditions, and farming activities. Small
farms grew vegetables (and raised livestock) using organic farming
practices, with or without certification, and the individual consumer
monitored.
Consumer demand for organic foods continues to increase, and high volume
sales through mass outlets, like supermarkets, is rapidly replacing the
direct farmer connection. For supermarket consumers, food production is not
easily observable, and product labelling, like "certified organic", is
relied on. Government regulations and third-party inspectors are looked to
for assurance.
A "certified organic" label is usually the only way for consumers to know
that a processed product is "organic".
Legal definition
To be certified organic, products must be grown and manufactured in a manner
that adheres to standards set by the country they are sold in:
Australia: NASAA Organic Standard.
Britain: Organic Farmers and Growers Organic Standards.
United States: NOP Program Standards.
In the United States, the Organic Food Production Act of 1990 (7 U.S.C.A. §
6501-22) created the National Organic Program (NOP). The regulations (7
C.F.R. Part 205) are enfored by the USDA through the National Organic
Program under this act. These laws essentially require that any product that
claims to be organic must have been manufactured and handled according to
specific NOP requirements. A USDA Organic seal identifies products with at
least 95% organic ingredients.
Evidence of the benefits of organic food
Main article: Motivations for organic agriculture
Defining the benefits of organic food has largely been left to word of
mouth, occasional media coverage, and the promotional efforts of organic
advocates. Even though many large food and beverage corporations, like Kraft
Foods, have rapidly moved to acquire significant stake in both fresh and
processed organic products, the specific sales points of "organics" go
largely unmentioned on product packaging and in advertising.
These comparisons need to be evaluated with care because neither
conventional nor organic farming practices are uniform.
For the environment
In several surveys that have looked at smaller studies to build an overall
comparison between conventional and organic systems of farming a general
agreement on benefits has been built. In these surveys it has been found
that:
* Organic farms do not release synthetic pesticides or herbicides into the
environment - some of which have the potential to harm local wildlife.
* Organic farms are better than conventional farms at sustaining diverse
ecosystems. That is, populations of plants and insects, as well as animals.
* When calculated either per unit area or per unit of yield: Organic farms
use less energy and produce less waste - waste such as packaging materials
for chemicals.
See "Organic FAQs" in the journal Nature for more details.
One study found a 20% smaller yield from organic farms using 50% less
fertilizer and 97% less pesticide. Studies comparing yields have had mixed
results. Supporters claim that organically managed soil has a higher quality
and higher water retention. This may help increase yields for organic farms
in drought years. One study of two organic farming systems and one
conventional found that, in one year's severe crop season drought, organic
soybean yields were 52% and 96% higher than the conventional system and
organic maize yields were 37% higher in one system, but 62% lower in the
other. Studies are also consistent in showing that organic farms are more
energy efficient.
For producers
For those who work on farms, there have been many studies on the health
effects of pesticide exposure. Even when pesticides are used correctly, they
still end up in the air and bodies of farm workers. Through these studies,
organophosphate pesticides have become associated with acute health problems
such as abdominal pain, dizziness, headaches, nausea, vomiting, as well as
skin and eye problems. In addition, there have been many other studies that
have found pesticide exposure is associated with more severe health problems
such as respiratory problems, memory disorders, dermatologic conditions,
cancer, depression, neurologic deficits,miscarriages, and birth defects.
Summaries of peer-reviewed research have examined the link between pesticide
exposure and neurological outcomes and cancer in organophosphate-exposed
workers.
For consumers
A study published by the National Research Council in 1993 determined that
for infants and children, the major source of exposure to pesticides is
through diet. A recent study in 2006 measured the levels of organophosphorus
pesticide exposure in 23 school children before and after replacing their
diet with organic food. In this study it was found that levels of
organophosphorus pesticide exposure dropped dramatically and immediately
when the children switched to an organic diet.
Most conventionally grown foods contain pesticides and herbicide residues
(see Pesticide residues in food). There is controversial data on the health
implications of certain pesticides. The herbicide Atrazine, for example, has
been shown in some experiments to be a teratogen, even at concentrations as
low as 0.1 part per billion, to emasculate male frogs by causing their
gonads to produce eggs - effectively turning males into hermaphrodites. The
US EPA and state agencies periodically review the licensing of suspect
pesticides, but the process of de-listing is slow. Furthermore, some
countries are slow to ban pesticides that have been unlisted in the United
States. It is sometimes claimed that local conditions (meaning the pests
causing crop damage) require that such pesticides be available for use.
Criticism
Criticism of organic food and organic agriculture includes the following:
Organic food is expensive
Critics claim that organic food is more expensive than conventional food and
thus too highly priced to be affordable to most people. Furthermore, many
argue that there is not enough evidence that supports the benefits of eating
organic food to warrant the additional cost.
Food safety
Conventional food does contain pesticide residues - often multiple residues
(see Pesticide residues in food for more information), but some
toxicologists consider the amount to be so low as to have no effect on the
consumer. In today's society, it is virtually impossible to grow produce
"residue free" and even organically grown foods do not claim to be
completely free of chemical residues.
The potential health effects of minute quantities of pesticide residues
described in the evidence of benefits section are subject to debate. Modern
analytical chemistry is capable of detecting such small quantities of a
substance that the meaning of a positive result is difficult to interpret,
and many scientists think that such residues are without effect. Pesticides
are subjected to a battery of tests before they can be approved by the EPA
and "residue tolerances" are established above which produce containing
these tolerances cannot be sold.
It should also be kept in mind that all substances are toxic at some level.
In fact Professors Lois Swirsky Gold and Bruce Ames have shown that 50% of
all natural chemicals in food gave a positive test as a carcinogen when
tested in rodents, casting doubt on the validity of the test methods.
The author Thomas DeGregori argues that at the heart of the organic food
movement are feelings of anti-technology and anti-modern science[34] and
points out that it is modern science, after all, that has increased the life
expectancy of many people and helps to feed the world's growing population.
Organic food has "sold out"
Organic food began as a small movement with farmers rejecting the use of
conventional farming practices. With the market share of Organic food
outpacing much of the food industry many big companies have moved into this
market. With these large companies, and with the creation of a legal
certification framework (2002 in the US), there is worry that the very
definition of organic food and will change from what it used to be.[35]
Sustainability
Newer non-organic practices, particularly no-till agriculture, which relies
on pesticides to clear the land, offer considerable improvements in energy
efficiency. Anthony Trewavas argues that the sustainability of organic
agriculture is less than that of conventional agriculture (see Trewavas
(2000)[36][37]).
* Soil benefits: Many of the soil benefits of organic agriculture have been
demonstrated to be due to crop rotation, which is not an inherently organic
strategy (see Trewavas (2000) cited above).
* Pesticide use: It is a common misconsception that organic agriculture does
not use pesticides. Some pesticides used on organic farms contain the heavy
metal copper, which can lead to copper accumulation in the soil. Other
pesticides that are approved for use by organic producers include ryania,
sabadilla, and rotenone.[38]
* Toxicity of "organic pesticides": Conventional pesticides must be
thoroughly studied before they can be placed on the market. However, such
studies are not required for the pesticides used in organic agriculture
[citation needed]. For example, the botanical pesticide Sabadilla is highly
toxic to honeybees, and according to the California Department of
Environmental Protection its mammalian toxicology has not been fully
studied.[39]
John Kent, Lecturer in Agricultural Protection, from the School of
Agriculture at Charles Sturt University in Australia supports the idea that
organically grown food is not as sustainable, arguing that while organically
grown food certainly has its place in today's free market, that if all
farmers decided to farm in such a way, "we would soon find ourselves in a
grave situation."[40]
Modern agriculture, utilizing large amounts of artificial chemical inputs,
monocultures, and intensive farming methods, is a recent phenomenon. Indeed,
one could argue that almost the entire history of agriculture consists of
what would be now termed "organic farming".
Rising consumer awareness of organic methods began in the 1950s with the
promotion of organic gardening. In the 1960s and 1970s, one effect of a
growing grassroots concern with environmental issues was the appearance of
more elaborate approaches to organic food, including food-buying co-ops and
dedicated organic producers. In the 1970s and 1980s, private sector organic
certification and development of regulations at the governmental level began
around the world. In the 1990s, formal organic certification began to be
legislated in various countries, and this trend continues to today. During
the same period, the organic food market experienced a sustained surge in
growth, expanding at around 20% a year (exceeding the rest of the food
industry by a factor of at least 10). The first years of the 21st century
saw multinational food corporations taking major stakes in the organic
market, and this has dramatically increased the variety, availability and
falling cost of processed organic food.[citation needed]
Modern developments
The prices for organic food has been, and continues to be, higher than their
conventional counterparts. This is because farmers who grow organic food
have to meet stricter quality standards to have their products certified
organic. More labor is required to achieve this, bringing up the cost.
Since the 80s there is an increasing number of supermarkets that carry large
volumes of organic food. This includes Whole Foods Market in the US, and
Waitrose in the UK. With large volume sales, these retailers have been
bringing the price of organic food down.
In the United States the pressure to bring the cost down will vastly
increase soon because in 2006, Wal-Mart, the largest grocery retailer,
announced plans to increase the amount of organic food available in its
stores.[41] Both conventionally grown and organic versions of certain
products will be available, but Wal-Mart intends to keep the price of the
organic versions to no more than 10% over the price of the conventionally
grown counterparts.
Because of Wal-Mart's size and business practices, their move into selling
organic food has some people worried.[42] Specifically, the increase in
demand for organic food will require that more organic produce be
imported.[43] Secondly, the push to lower prices "would virtually guarantee
that Wal-Mart's version of cheap organic food is not sustainable".[44]
Related movements
Various alternative organic standards are emerging. They generally bypass
formal certification, which can be expensive and cumbersome, and provide
their own definition of organic food. One such, the Authentic Food standard,
proposed by leading US organic farmer Eliot Coleman, includes criteria that
are incompatible with current agribusiness:
* All foods are produced by the growers who sell them.
* Fresh fruits and vegetables, milk, eggs and meat products are produced
within a 50-mile radius of their place of their final sale.
* The seed and storage crops (grains, beans, nuts, potatoes, etc.) are
produced within a 300-mile radius of their final sale.
* Only traditional processed foods such as cheese, wine, bread and
lactofermented products may claim, "Made with Authentic ingredients."[45]
Some are also implementing new approaches to defining and buying food.
Community-supported agriculture (CSA) is one such approach, that cuts out
all the middlemen by having consumers partner with local farmers. CSA
members prepurchase "shares" in a season's harvest, and pick up their weekly
portions from distribution sites. Thus, consumers provide direct financing
for farms, participate in the risks and rewards of annual growing
conditions, and participate with farmers in distribution networks.
CSA is one example of "buying locally," which is often valued by both the
organic food consumer and producer. Generally speaking, locally-grown
seasonal food can be brought to market more quickly than food that has to be
transported long distances, and therefore can be better tasting and to some
degree more nutritious by virtue of its freshness. Additionally, the act of
buying foods that are locally-grown benefits local farmers and other
employers. This local food approach is seen as a direct investment in one's
own community and a way to reduce economic dependence.
Organic food is also often linked with the fair trade movement, based on the
principle that social and environmental sustainability are inextricably
interdependent.
Facts and statistics
Organic Seals
United States
image:JAS_organic_seal.gif
Japan
Germany
Australia
While organic food accounts for 1–2% of total food sales worldwide, the
organic food market is growing rapidly, far ahead of the rest of the food
industry, in both developed and developing nations.
* World organic food sales were US $23 billion in 2002.[46]
* The world organic market has been growing by 20% a year since the early
1990s, with future growth estimates ranging from 10-50% annually depending
on the country.
In the United States, where organic food is federally regulated by the
National Organic Program:
* "Organic products are now available in nearly 20,000 natural food stores
and 73% of conventional grocery stores, and account for approximately 1-2%
of total food sales in the U.S." — Feb 2003[47]
* Two thirds of organic milk and cream and half of organic cheese and yogurt
are sold through conventional supermarkets.[48]
In the European Union, organic food is regulated by the EU-Eco-regulation
Austria:
* The government has created incentives so that within the next few years,
10% of its food will comprise locally grown organic foods. [citation needed]
Germany:
* Baby food is almost exclusively organic, and over 30% of bread baked in
Munich is organic.
Italy:
* Existing legislation calls for all school lunches to be organic by 2005.
[citation needed]
Poland:
* Since May 2004, products of certified organic farms in Poland are allowed
to carry the EU organic farming label, but it is not obligatory. This sign
certifies that a given product was produced according to the EU 2092/91
organic farming regulation and therefore can be freely traded and marketed
on the whole Common Market. In 2005 already 168,000 ha of land were under
organic management. The value of the organic market in Poland is estimated
at Eur 50 million (2006).
UK:
* By January 2005, 686,100 ha of land was managed to organic standards.
Organic food sales increased from just over £100 million in 1993/94 to £1.21
billion in 2004 (an 11% increase on 2003).
In Cuba:
* After the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1990, the government converted
the entire country to organic agriculture, and currently organic agriculture
is the mainstream and many pesticides are not permitted by law.
However, Cuba defines "organic" differently from many countries and
encourages genetically engineered crops, particularly those with enhanced
nutritional content and vaccines from GMO plants.
See also
* Organic certification
* Organic farming
* Organic gardening
* Pesticide
* Herbicide
* Sustainable agriculture
* Genetically Modified Food
References
1. ^ Organic Food Standards and Labels: The Facts. National Organic Program.
Retrieved on 2006-06-06.
2. ^ Family Farms. Local Harvest. Retrieved on 2006-06-06.
3. ^ Hansen, Nanette (2004). Organic food sales see healthy growth (html).
MSNBC. Retrieved on 2006-06-20.
4. ^ Warner, Melanie. "What Is Organic? Powerful Players Want a Say". New
York Times: Nov. 1, 2005.
5. ^ Trewavas, Anthony (March 2001). "Urban myths of organic farming".
Nature 410: 409-410.
6. ^ Trewavas, Anthony (2004). "A critical assessment of organic
farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the
potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture". Crop Protection
23: 757–781. DOI:doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.009.
7. ^
8. ^ "Corporate Industry Structure: 2005", by Phil Howard, Center for
Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, University of California, Santa
Cruz.
9. ^ Stolze, M.; Piorr, A.; Häring, A.M. and Dabbert, S. (2000)
Environmental impacts of organic farming in Europe. Organic Farming in
Europe: Economics and Policy Vol. 6. Universität Hohenheim, Stuttgart-Hohenheim.
10. ^ Hansen, Birgitte, Alrøe, H. J. & Kristensen, E. S. (Jan 2001).
"Approaches to assess the environmental impact of organic farming with
particular regard to Denmark". Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 83:
11-26. DOI:doi:10.1016/S0167-8809(00)00257-7.
11. ^ Nelson et.al (April 2004). "Organic FAQs". Nature 428: 796-798.
DOI:10.1038/428796a.
12. ^ Mader, et.al. (2002). "Soil Fertility and Biodiversity in Organic
Farming". Science 296: 1694–1697.
13. ^ Welsh, Rick (1999). "Economics of Organic Grain and Soybean Production
in the Midwestern United States". Henry A. Wallace Institute for Alternative
Agriculture.
14. ^ Johnston, A. E. (1986). "Soil organic-matter, effects on soils and
crops". Soil Use Management 2: 97-105.
15. ^ Lotter, D. W., Seidel, R. & Liebhardt W. (2003). "The performance of
organic and conventional cropping systems in an extreme climate year".
American Journal of Alternative Agriculture 18: 146-154.
16. ^ Reganold et.al (April 2001). "Sustainability of three apple production
systems". Nature 410: 926-930.
17. ^ Linda A. McCauley, et.al. (2006). "Studying Health Outcomes in
Farmworker Populations Exposed to Pesticides". Environmental Health
Perspectives 114.
18. ^ Ecobichon DJ. 1996. Toxic effects of pesticides. In: Casarett and
Doull's Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons (Klaassen CD, Doull J, eds).
5th ed. New York:MacMillan, 643–689.
19. ^ Arcury TA, Quandt SA, Mellen BG (2003). "An exploratory analysis of
occupational skin disease among Latino migrant and seasonal farmworkers in
North Carolina". Journal of Agricultural Safety and Health 9 (3): 221–32.
20. ^ O'Malley MA (1997). "Skin reactions to pesticides". Occupational
Medicine 12: 327–345.
21. ^ Daniels JL, Olshan AF, Savitz DA. (1997). "Pesticides and childhood
cancers". Environmental Health Perspectives 105: 1068–1077.
22. ^ Kamel F, et.al. (2003). "Neurobehavioral performance and work
experience in Florida farmworkers". Environmental Health Perspectives 111:
1765-1772.
23. ^ Firestone JA, Smith-Weller T, Franklin G, Swanson P, Longsteth WT,
Checkoway H. (2005). "Pesticides and risk of Parkinson disease: a
population-based case-control study". Archives of Neurology 62: 91-95.
24. ^ Engel LS, O'Meara ES, Schwartz SM. (2000). "Maternal occupation in
agriculture and risk of limb defects in Washington State, 1980-1993".
Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health 26 (3): 193–198.
Cordes DH, Rea DF. (1988). "Health hazards of farming". American Family
Physician 38: 233–243.
Das R, Steege A, Baron S, Beckman J, Harrison R (2001). "Pesticide-related
illness among migrant farm workers in the United States". International
Journal of Occupational and Environmental Health 7: 303–312.
Eskenazi B, Bradman A, Castorina R. (1999). "Exposures of children to
organophosphate pesticides and their potential adverse health effects".
Environmental Health Perspectives 107: 409–419.
Garcia AM (2003). "Pesticide exposure and women's health". American Journal
of Industrial Medicine 44 (6): 584–594.
Moses M. (1989). "Pesticide-related health problems and farmworkers".
American Association of Occupational Health Nurses 37: 115–130.
Schwartz DA, Newsum LA, Heifetz RM. (1986). "Parental occupation and birth
outcome in an agricultural community". Scandinavian Journal of Work,
Environment & Health 12: 51-54.
Stallones L, Beseler C. (2002). "Pesticide illness, farm practices, and
neurological symptoms among farm residents in Colorado". Environ Res 90:
89–97.
Strong, LL, Thompson B, Coronado GD, Griffith WC, Vigoren EM, Islas I.
(2004). "Health symptoms and exposure to organophosphate pesticides in
farmworkers". American Journal of Industrial Medicine 46: 599–606.
Van Maele-Fabry G, Willems JL. (2003). "Occupation related pesticide
exposure and cancer of the prostate: a meta-analysis". Occupational and
Environmental Medicine 60 (9): 634–642.
25. ^ Alavanja MC, Hoppin JA, Kamel F. (2004). "Health effects of chronic
pesticide exposure: cancer and neurotoxicity". Annual Review of Public
Health 25: 155–197.
26. ^ Kamel F, Hoppin JA (2004). "Association of pesticide exposure with
neurological dysfunction and disease". Environmental Health Perspectives
112: 950–958.
27. ^ National Research Council (1993). Pesticides in the Diets of Infants
and Children, 1st, National Academies Press. ISBN 0-309-04875-3.
28. ^ Lu, Chensheng, et. al. (2006). "Organic Diets Significantly Lower
Children’s Dietary Exposure to Organophosphorus Pesticides". Environmental
Health Perspectives 114: 260-263.
29. ^ Tyrone Hayes, Kelly Haston, Mable Tsui, Anhthu Hoang, Cathryn Haeffele,
and Aaron Vonk (2003). "Atrazine-Induced Hermaphroditism at 0.1 ppb in
American Leopard Frogs". Environmental Health Perspectives 111.
30. ^ FAQ: Chemical Residues. CF Fresh. Retrieved on 2006-10-06.
31. ^ Chem-News October 1990. Cornell University. Retrieved on 2006-10-06.
32. ^ Toxicology & Risk. The Environmental Literacy Council. Retrieved on
2006-10-05.
33. ^ Gold, Lois; Slone, T.H., Ames, B.N., and Manley, N.B. (2001).
"Pesticide Residues in Food and Cancer Risk: A Critical Analysis.". In:
Handbook of Pesticide Toxicology, (2nd ed.), 799-843, Academic Press.
34. ^ DeGregori, Thomas R. (2004). Origins of the Organic Agriculture
Debate. Iowa State Press, Ames, Iowa, 211 p. ISBN 0-8138-0513-9
35. ^ Shapin, Steven. "Paradise Sold." The New Yorker, May 15, 2006.
36. ^ Trewavas, Anthony (March 2001). "Urban myths of organic farming".
Nature 410: 409-410.
37. ^ Trewavas, Anthony (2004). "A critical assessment of organic
farming-and-food assertions with particular respect to the UK and the
potential environmental benefits of no-till agriculture". Crop Protection
23: 757–781. DOI:doi:10.1016/j.cropro.2004.01.009.
38. ^ Organic Pest Control (2006-07-25). Idaho Association of Soil
Conservation Districts (2004).
39. ^ http://www.cdpr.ca.gov/docs/toxsums/pdfs/521.pdf
40. ^ Pesticides in Agriculture. The Regional Institute. Retrieved on
2006-10-6.
41. ^ Warner, Melanie. "Wal-Mart Eyes Organic Foods", New York Times, May
12, 2006.
42. ^ Scheuer, Kif (2006). Wal-mart's organic bomb (html). Grist Magazine.
Retrieved on 2006-06-04.
43. ^ Gogoi, Pallavi. "Wal-Mart's Organic Offensive", Business Week, March
29, 2006.
44. ^ Pollan, Michael. "Mass Natural: With Wal-Mart going organic, where
will organic go?", New York Times Magazine, June 4, 2006.
45. ^ "Authentic Food - Authentic Farming", by Eliot Coleman, Mother Earth
News.
46. ^ The Global Market for Organic Food & Drink (html). Organic Monitor
(2002). Retrieved on 2006-06-20.
47. ^ Catherine Greene and Carolyn Dimitri (2003). Organic Agriculture:
Gaining Ground (html). USDA Economic Research Service. Retrieved on
2006-06-20.
48. ^ Dryer, Jerry (2003). Market Trends: Organic Lessons (html). Prepared
Foods. Retrieved on 2006-06-20.